翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Siyahamba
・ Siyahchashm
・ Siyahleya
・ Siyahrud Rural District
・ Siyahrud Rural District (Mazandaran Province)
・ Siyahrud Rural District (Tehran Province)
・ Siyahtan
・ Siyahu
・ Siyahu Rural District
・ Siyahun
・ Siyaj K'ak'
・ Siyaji
・ Sixtiers
・ Sixties Icon
・ Sixties Power Ballads
Sixties Scoop
・ Sixtieth Amendment of the Constitution of India
・ Sixtieth Texas Legislature
・ Sixtinus Amama
・ Sixto
・ Sixto Agudo
・ Sixto Barrera
・ Sixto Batista Santana
・ Sixto Betancourt
・ Sixto Brillantes
・ Sixto Casanovas
・ Sixto Durán Ballén
・ Sixto Escobar
・ Sixto González
・ Sixto Hernández Serrano


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Sixties Scoop : ウィキペディア英語版
Sixties Scoop
The term Sixties Scoop (or Canada Scoops), refers to the Canadian practice, beginning in the 1960s and continuing until the late 1980s, of taking ("scooping up") children of Aboriginal peoples in Canada from their families for placing in foster homes or adoption. The children were typically sent to Canada's Indian residential schools,〔Lyons, T. (2000)〕 though a few were placed in the United States or western Europe.〔 J.S. Gregory, Susan Farley, & Darlene Auger, 2012. "Stolen Nation," in ''Eye Weekly,'' January 13, 2000. Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.〕 The term "Sixties scoop" was coined by Patrick Johnston in his 1983 report ''Native Children and the Child Welfare System''.〔''Native Children and the Child Welfare System.'' Canadian Council on Social Development. Ottawa, 1983〕〔CBC Radio (March 12, 1983) "(Stolen generations )" Program: Our Native Land. Broadcast Date: March 12, 1983.〕 It is a variation of the broader term Baby Scoop Era to refer to the period from the late 1950s to 1980s when large numbers of children were taken from their parents for adoption.

An estimated 20,000 aboriginal children were taken from their families and fostered or adopted out to primarily white middle-class families, some within Canada and some in the US or Western Europe.〔Philp, Margaret (2002). "(The Land of Lost Children )", ''The Globe and Mail'', Saturday, December 21, 2002,〕〔Crey, Ernie, & Fournier, Suzanne (1998). ''Stolen From Our Embrace. The Abduction of First Nations Children and the Restoration of Aboriginal Communities.'' D&M Publishers Inc. ISBN 978-1-55054-661-3 Winner of the BC Book Prize Hubert-Evans Prize for Non-Fiction〕

This government policy was discontinued in the mid-1980s, after Ontario chiefs passed resolutions against it and a Manitoba judicial inquiry harshly condemned it.〔Lyons, T. (2000). "(Stolen Nation )," in ''Eye Weekly'', January 13, 2000. Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.〕 This judicial inquiry was headed by Justice Edwin Kimelman, who published the ''File Review Report. Report of the Review Committee on Indian and Métis Adoptions and Placements'' (also known as the Kimelman Report).〔"No Quiet Place" Community Services, Winnipeg, 1985.〕

Two lawsuits have been filed in Canada by survivors of the Sixties Scoop, one in Ontario in 2010〔Chiefs of Ontario - UPDATE Preparation for Special Chiefs Assembly. (60s Scoop Litigation ).〕〔"(Former CAS wards seek billions in lawsuit )" ''Wawatay News'', July 22, 2010, Volume 37, No. 15.〕 and one in British Columbia in 2011.〔Fournier, Suzanne (2011). "B.C. natives sue federal government for millions over 'Sixties' Scoop'." ''The Vancouver Sun'', May 31, 2011. Postmedia News.〕〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.kleinlyons.com/class/aboriginal-sixties-scoop )
== History ==
The residential school system was implemented by the Canadian government and was administered by various churches. The purpose was to educate aboriginal children to Euro-Canadian and Christian values so they could become part of mainstream society. The school system was in effect from 1880s and until the late 20th century. This system forced children to be removed from their families and homes for long and extended period of times. The policy of the schools forbade the children to speak their own languages or to acknowledge their culture in any way. Survivors of the residential schools have come forward and spoken out about physical, spiritual, sexual and psychological abuse they experienced from the staff of these schools. The lasting cultural impact has been widespread and extensive:
Residential schools systematically undermined Aboriginal culture across Canada and disrupted families for generations, severing the ties through which Aboriginal culture is taught and sustained, and contributing to a general loss of language and culture. Because they were removed from their families, many students grew up without experiencing a nurturing family life and without the knowledge and skills to raise their own families. The devastating effects of the residential schools are far-reaching and continue to have significant impact on Aboriginal communities. Because the government's and the churches’ intent was to eradicate all aspects of Aboriginal culture in these young people and interrupt its transmission from one generation to the next, the residential school system is commonly considered a form of cultural genocide.


The Canadian government started to close the compulsory residential school system in the 1950s and 60s but it was the opinion of the government authorities at that time that Aboriginal children would benefit from a better education from the public school system.
This transition to provincial services led to a 1951 Indian Act amendment that enabled the Province to provide services to Aboriginal people where none existed federally. Child protection was one of these areas. In 1951, twenty-nine Aboriginal children were in provincial care in British Columbia; by 1964, that number was 1,466. Aboriginal children, who had comprised only 1 percent of all children in care, came to make up just over 34 percent.


Johnston, while researching his report called ''Native Children and the Child Welfare System,'' collected statistical data from various stake holders within the community, including levels of government, aboriginal organizations and band council. Johnston was given the term "Sixties Scoop" by a social worker from British Columbia where she disclosed "with tears in her eyes – that it was common practice in BC in the mid-sixties to 'scoop' from their mothers on reserves almost all newly born children. She was crying because she realized – 20 years later – what a mistake that had been".〔

In the ''Kimelman Report'' that was released in 1985 made the following observation about child welfare policies in that province:
The native people of Manitoba have charged that the interpretation of the term “best interest of the child” has been wrought with cultural bias in a system dominated by white, middle class workers, board of directors, administrators, lawyers and judges. They also alleged that in application of the legislation, there are many factors which are crucially important to the native people which have been ignored, misinterpreted, or simply not recognized by the child welfare system.〔


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Sixties Scoop」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.